When do the new direct observation requirements become effective?
They are effective August 25, 2008. The railroads have requested an extension of time to manage implementation procedures, and so it is possible that the date may change.
For any federal follow-up tests that are required, but have not yet been completed, they must be direct observe tests if performed after August 24, 2008.
ˆTopWhich types of tests will require direct observations?
What exactly does the new regulation require that the direct observer do?
Part 40.67(i) states:
As the observer, you must request the employee to raise his or her shirt, blouse, or dress/skirt, as appropriate, above the waist; and lower clothing and underpants to show you, by turning around, that they do not have a prosthetic device. After you have determined that the employee does not have such a device, you may permit the employee to return clothing to its proper position for observed urination.
ˆTopWill all direct observations be done in the same way - using the new part 40 regulations?
Yes.
ˆTopWho will perform the direct observation?
In all cases, the person who performs the direct observation must be the same gender as the employee, also known as the donor, who is providing the specimen.
UP will work with our contract collection company, ADTS, to strive for direct observations to be performed by the collector or collector-appointed “Direct Observer.”
ˆTopWhat if the employee refuses to provide a sample under direct observation as required by the federal regulations?
If the employee has been notified that the test will take place, then the test must be completed. If a direct observation is refused, then it will be considered a refusal to test.
The following note is included as part of the “Urine Specimen Collection Guidelines,” issued by the United States Department of Transportation, through its Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance:
ˆTopNote: With respect to direct observation collections, the following situations are considered refusals to test:
- The employee declines to allow a directly observed collection required or permitted by Part 40 to occur.
- The employee fails to follow the observer’s instructions to raise and lower their clothing and to turn around to permit the observer to determine if the employee has a prosthetic or other device that could be used to interfere with the collection process.
- The employee possesses or wears a prosthetic or other device that could be used to interfere with the collection process.
In any of these situations, the collector discards any specimen the employee provided previously and notifies the DER as soon as possible.
After the employee is visually inspected and no prosthetic device is found, then what happens?
As was the case under the prior regulations, the direct observer must see the urine leave the body and flow into the collection container. Then the employee and direct observer leave the enclosed toilet stall/restroom. The employee hands the collection container directly to the collector, if that person is different from the direct observer, and the test is complete.